|
Post by thesinner on Sept 20, 2009 7:43:08 GMT -5
Drop it, the main reason I kept leaving is that I struggeled to keep up with two shows a week, and now with school I'm strugeling. How About during school time we have one, and during the time off we have two? Ayayayaya, hush it Jin. This is about me maybe returning, not you. >_>
|
|
|
Post by Michael Smart on Sept 20, 2009 9:06:18 GMT -5
I'm all for dropping one show, I'm having trouble writing even one segment per show at the moment.
|
|
Torak
poster
Imagination and fantasy are two components of delusion
Posts: 713
|
Post by Torak on Sept 20, 2009 9:14:29 GMT -5
I support this. Hell, I'd even consider returning if it was a lightened workload. Of course, there would always be the issue of bringing Torak back from the dead...
|
|
TJ
Experienced Member
I LOVE DAN WHITE
Good, you're working out Freeman....you're gonna need to
Posts: 848
|
Post by TJ on Sept 20, 2009 9:36:06 GMT -5
I support this. Hell, I'd even consider returning if it was a lightened workload. Of course, there would always be the issue of bringing Torak back from the dead... Evil Doctor manager?
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Sept 20, 2009 9:49:46 GMT -5
The PPV names are good the way we are. I disagree with the notion of Supercards though in place of PPVs. Just have 8 around the year or so.
Jan: Ragnarok Mid March: Genocide April: Fallen Heroes June: Omega Effect Mid Aug: Heatwave Sept: EOTR Mid Nov: Champion Named PPV Dec: Winter's Discontent
|
|
|
Post by Kim Jong CP on Sept 20, 2009 9:50:35 GMT -5
I support this. Hell, I'd even consider returning if it was a lightened workload. Of course, there would always be the issue of bringing Torak back from the dead... Evil Doctor manager?
|
|
|
Post by rep on Sept 20, 2009 10:01:54 GMT -5
The PPV names are good the way we are. I disagree with the notion of Supercards though in place of PPVs. Just have 8 around the year or so. Jan: Ragnarok Mid March: Genocide April: Fallen Heroes June: Omega Effect Mid Aug: Heatwave Sept: EOTR Mid Nov: Champion Named PPV Dec: Winter's Discontent I like mine better.
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Sept 20, 2009 10:03:52 GMT -5
Cool story bro
|
|
|
Post by rep on Sept 20, 2009 10:05:10 GMT -5
You're doing it wrong.
|
|
VorteX
Experienced Member
Stay a while...and listen.
Posts: 723
|
Post by VorteX on Sept 20, 2009 10:43:07 GMT -5
I do really like the Fallout name though, and since it's doing nothing at the moment I say we should rename our 'one show a week' to that. I know it's original intention was to break newcomers in, however from my standpoint that never happened and Fallout always was about NPC's.
Anyway, back to the topic at hand. For once I am going to agree with Rep here and say that I like the revisions since I forgot that FH's title shot was specific to OE and not just anytime. I guess it'll take some getting used to if we do put in the supercards, however some of our 7 match shows were basically supecards anyway so that would obviously have to change.
In any case this is a huge (and from the looks of it very beneficial) change for ACW. Yay for topic civility!
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Sept 20, 2009 10:56:30 GMT -5
Well the BC always made an effort that every 6 weeks-2 months a show would have a gimmick anyways, be it a night of champions or the Cyber Sunday spinoff. So that could be the same, really.
I just don't like the idea of moving PPV names around all over the place, that's my main issue here. There's nothing wrong with any of the names, and we shouldn't move names about all over the shop.
|
|
|
Post by thesinner on Sept 20, 2009 10:57:51 GMT -5
I do really like the Fallout name though, and since it's doing nothing at the moment I say we should rename our 'one show a week' to that. I know it's original intention was to break newcomers in, however from my standpoint that never happened and Fallout always was about NPC's. Anyway, back to the topic at hand. For once I am going to agree with Rep here and say that I like the revisions since I forgot that FH's title shot was specific to OE and not just anytime. I guess it'll take some getting used to if we do put in the supercards, however some of our 7 match shows were basically supecards anyway so that would obviously have to change. In any case this is a huge (and from the looks of it very beneficial) change for ACW. Yay for topic civility! I was a Fallout exclusive on my first serious attempt here.
|
|
|
Post by rep on Sept 20, 2009 11:12:21 GMT -5
Well the BC always made an effort that every 6 weeks-2 months a show would have a gimmick anyways, be it a night of champions or the Cyber Sunday spinoff. So that could be the same, really. [/color] No... what we need is less gimmicks. We're pulling back the reigns on PPVs and TV to increase quality. Gimmick overkill won't help. I just don't like the idea of moving PPV names around all over the place, that's my main issue here. There's nothing wrong with any of the names, and we shouldn't move names about all over the shop. Waaah. You'll get used to it. There is an issue with a few of the names, because point blank, they suck. If we're going to start doing some re-arranging we should take the opportunity to get as much good done in one swoop as possible, which includes getting rid of weak names like Winter's Discontent and arranging events in an order per month that has a nice fit. The third draft of my schedule is a glove perfect fit. I really see zero issue with anything on there. I haven't proposed any new names (god forbid) and I've worked with what is already there. Wow, a PPV changed to a different month. Are you really going to make an issue of this because of something that minor that in the long run is irrelevant? YOU SEE WHAT YOU'VE DONE? You've made this a flamewar. We were getting along so well until you had to disagree about something so pointless.
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Sept 20, 2009 11:57:08 GMT -5
My god, you're dull.
|
|
|
Post by thesinner on Sept 20, 2009 12:22:00 GMT -5
Another masterfully written, well-thought out and mature response from our champion here. I'm with Rep on this, his revisions to the calendar are spot on.
|
|