|
Post by jonnyomega on Aug 26, 2008 13:29:50 GMT -5
I quite like Joe, just not as champion. I was more into him when he was chasing the title, much like I was with AJ Styles back in the day.
|
|
|
Post by xs3 on Aug 26, 2008 13:45:42 GMT -5
Not true, Senator. I like Joe but I hate how he's been booked in TNA.
And in regards to the whole Tenay/West thing in TNA, it'd be so much better and probably more tolerable if one of them turned heel or if they brought in a heel commentator. Tenay and West simply gang up on the heels so much, they actually make you sympathize for them.
|
|
Jake
Members
Too fabulous for a title.....
Guido's reaction to Taylor's ban...JAGERBOMBS ALL AROUND!
Posts: 3,683
|
Post by Jake on Aug 26, 2008 14:15:19 GMT -5
lol most stupidest...
|
|
|
Post by silencio on Aug 26, 2008 16:02:39 GMT -5
My comp blows up for a week and I miss all of this, damn.
|
|
|
Post by The Senator on Aug 26, 2008 16:19:51 GMT -5
TNA has no clue how to book Joe as champ, that I fully agree with. If you saw him during the 1 hour Impact days, the crowd was fully behind him, chanting the "Joe's gonna kill you" chant every time he confronted someone, and he was literally booked as unstoppable, rarely talking, and just taking care of business, very similar to Taz(with one Z) in the old ECW days, when he was the champ.
Today, Joe's still capable of putting on a fun match(and he is certainly more agile than Skum gave him credit for), but he's also regressed a bit from his RoH style(yeah, yeah, watch his RoH stuff...), and by far, worst of all, has been portrayed as whiny, has been forced into a consistent speaking role when he'd be better served as the silent dominator, and takes forever, if ever, to get his comeupppance on his foes. Sure, I like Booker, but Joe should have demolsihed him and gone onto something else after their title match, instead of the ridiculous stolen belt deal, and the endless saga of Sting.
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Aug 26, 2008 16:25:32 GMT -5
^^Booker would have killed Joe.
|
|
|
Post by jonnyomega on Aug 26, 2008 16:45:56 GMT -5
The claims that Samoa Joe isn't agile are way off.
Move one...
|
|
|
Post by stranger on Aug 26, 2008 16:54:02 GMT -5
Just because he CAN do those moves, doesn't mean he SHOULD. He comes off looking like a slow and sluggish fat man.
|
|
|
Post by jonnyomega on Aug 26, 2008 16:56:43 GMT -5
But the fact he can do those moves is proof of his agility. I also find it funny that you make comments about fat losers when you have The Blue Meanie in your avatar.
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Aug 26, 2008 16:59:29 GMT -5
You're a tit, SKuM.
|
|
|
Post by The Senator on Aug 26, 2008 17:48:20 GMT -5
Personally, I don't know how you could think he looks slow and sluggish while doing fast paced stuff. This isn't Mark Henry jumping off the top rope here(and I actually like Mark Henry, anymore), Joe does that stuff quite often, and looks credible enough while executing it.
|
|
|
Post by silencio on Aug 26, 2008 17:49:14 GMT -5
Just a question, isn't the conflict resolution board for conflicts in ACW? >_>
|
|
|
Post by jonnyomega on Aug 26, 2008 17:53:11 GMT -5
This is a conflict in ACW. Surge posted his opinion and got flamed big time for it.
|
|
|
Post by Jonny Spade on Aug 26, 2008 17:53:53 GMT -5
Don't you dare question tactics that a mod takes on the boards. :<
|
|
|
Post by silencio on Aug 26, 2008 17:54:45 GMT -5
I:-|
|
|