Rena
New Member
Posts: 10
|
Post by Rena on Jul 28, 2005 10:25:26 GMT -5
I think she shouldn't have an RP styled ACW...simply because a lot of us joined ACW because there wouldnt be so much hassle with RPs, since there are none. I can see if people want to RP for some matches as an option, but forcing us all into RPs is unfair. We joined the site as it was, and to durastically change it now is unbusinesslike. That's like getting a job as a gametester, and then they say "We're changing the company to lingerie testing"...it jsut can't work that way
speaking of work, I have school and other things in my life which prohibits me from working on the computer RP-wise. That is the very reason I have stayed with ACW and have left other RP-oriented sites.
If we end up ahving an RP system..I will more than likely have to leave, for I wouldnt have enough time to RP for my matches.
I think using RP as an option is fine...but dont make it manditory for the whole fed.
|
|
|
Post by scrawn on Jul 28, 2005 10:33:07 GMT -5
^^ That's also true. With roleplays I tend to find myself writing for an hour or two when I could be playing football or studying. With the system we have, it means that I can get on the computer if I have a few minutes, write up a segment in 15-20 minutes and be on my way.
|
|
|
Post by Latino on Jul 28, 2005 11:10:49 GMT -5
I've gotta agree on the time issue. I myself do not have the time to focus on rps. It's the reason i don't participate in other feds or even the HWL tourney. Between helping running the fed, site, and my own life there's no real time.
Also I must comment on our own system. Yes it's not perfect as we all know. And yes sometimes we get results that come out of nowhere, due to the system. But we have never been about winning matches. It's always been about the fun we have with our characters and storylines. Though that doesn't mean we as management won't still work to tweak and refine things such as our system and the roster.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Jul 28, 2005 12:35:20 GMT -5
The chief thing about ACW is the storylines, and we can't ruin that. Anyone who says otherwise...well, say so, I'd like to hear what you think.
I like Latino's idea, where we start with the RP Title. I'm for it, though we should give it another name...
|
|
|
Post by cernunnus on Jul 28, 2005 13:11:34 GMT -5
The TV title? It kinda makes sense. It's a title that's determined by the promos, and the promos take place on TV, I don't know. A specific title and division for RPers could solve some problems.
|
|
|
Post by scrawn on Jul 28, 2005 13:18:07 GMT -5
That would be cool, but there should be a title that replaces it...
|
|
|
Post by Latino on Jul 28, 2005 13:19:18 GMT -5
Well we had talk of unifying two titles which would end up being the "RP" title.
|
|
|
Post by tntoholic on Jul 28, 2005 15:13:32 GMT -5
I would love the RP Title be called the Television Title.
It makes sense.
But what would we unify?
|
|
|
Post by BK London on Jul 28, 2005 15:18:57 GMT -5
We would unify the ET and Jr Title. Just because.
|
|
|
Post by scrawn on Jul 28, 2005 15:22:10 GMT -5
Why Jr? It's still cool
|
|
|
Post by The Senator on Jul 28, 2005 15:44:42 GMT -5
I see no reason to eliminate the Jr title, especially since I'm going to restart my house shows, putting an emphasis on the Fallout roster once again
|
|
|
Post by The Senator on Jul 28, 2005 15:45:42 GMT -5
Although I think the ET would be just fine becoming the RP rules title, it could even keep it's former name(although a title redesign would be mandatory)
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Jul 28, 2005 16:32:55 GMT -5
Combine ET and LW, create TV.
|
|
|
Post by BK London on Jul 28, 2005 17:01:34 GMT -5
Personally now. I think we need the LW Title. Every fed has an LW Title.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Jul 28, 2005 17:53:46 GMT -5
*rolls eyes*
Combine Junior and ET. Add TV.
|
|