|
Post by hunter on Dec 1, 2007 18:46:36 GMT -5
Also Hunter about your comment. You're a champion. You should face who is worthy of fighting for the title. Which I do.
|
|
|
Post by Thunderkiss on Dec 1, 2007 18:52:36 GMT -5
I can only speak from my point of view. I feel as if I've hit a glass ceiling. Its like I've done what I need to do to at least make it to the top, but then I can't go any further because I didn't ask a guy/girl months/years ago for a title shot or they simply do not like me.
As far as defending the actual belt. If the shoe was on the other foot in this case, I can honestly say yes, I would defend against everyone I could. In fact, if I ever make it to the top one day, my plan is to have a World Title match weekly. If I lose.. well then I lose and then I have something to fight for again. If I win, well then, onto the next week.
|
|
|
Post by BK London on Dec 1, 2007 18:55:12 GMT -5
....don't have a title match weekly.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Dec 1, 2007 18:55:51 GMT -5
This is where you and I differ in my opinion. I think if a World Title is defended weekly against everyone, it loses credibility. Having good, strong, solid feuds behind titles is much better and more interesting to me, which is why I don't do random defenses. Everyone who wanted a title shot from me I have granted one to, which is precisely why I'm booked into April. That includes TK, for anyone who wants to use him as an example. I'm not ducking anyone, I just think it's better to defend against a strong competitor after a good, solid feud as opposed to "LOLZ, RANDOM CLUSTERFUCK DEFENSE!" EDIT: Darn, BK beat me to it.
|
|
|
Post by Thunderkiss on Dec 1, 2007 18:59:00 GMT -5
Uh Sorry Hunter, I'm just not going to allow you to sit back and say you "granted" me a title shot. We know who in reality did.
No... just no.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Dec 1, 2007 19:01:11 GMT -5
I did. I could have easily not defended against you, but I wanted you to leave me alone because you complained your way into it.
|
|
|
Post by Thunderkiss on Dec 1, 2007 19:07:49 GMT -5
I did. I could have easily not defended against you, but I wanted you to leave me alone because you complained your way into it. As you've seen in this thread my boy, its not just me complaining about the current state of the championship. You know full well you told me you wouldnt give me a shot until APRIL, a full six months away. Even then you stated you wouldnt have the belt so it was all meaningless. So no, you didn't give me any shot Hunter. As far as what you call my "complaining" goes, again don't try to single yourself out because I have been requesting a championship committee long before you won the belt. Feuds and title defenses do NOT have to go hand in hand. A required mid month match where the opponent is chosen by a championship committee is an idea that I will fight till the end. Its fair and it finally takes away "who you know" and replaces it with "what you've done." Not only that it FITS the rules that were decided by the mods, rules in which I hope you don't ignore, because that sends a strong statement from your part.
|
|
|
Post by jonnyomega on Dec 1, 2007 19:10:12 GMT -5
I think the Championship Committee idea is great.
I've had the title for a while and haven't defended it yet much to my surprise.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Dec 1, 2007 19:11:57 GMT -5
I've already told you my stance about the championship committee. Most of ACW agrees with me. So keeping fighting for that lost cause.
Thing is, TK, I did say April. Then I realized I could just add you into another feud, and since the other person didn't care about whether or not you were added, I figured I'd get it out of the way and over with, despite the fact that I've always wanted a one-on-one feud with said person. Don't think the mods "made me" do it. The first thing I said was "no, I won't do it." I later withdrew my statement because I considered the possibility of a triple threat, and it played out. So everyone wins.
Now shut up. Honestly, all you do is complain. Patience is a virtue.
|
|
|
Post by Thunderkiss on Dec 1, 2007 19:19:21 GMT -5
Most of ACW agrees with you? Perhaps they do, however, judging by this thread I'd say the idea would have a lot of support really Hunter. And yup, I am going to continue to fight for a loss cause because its anything BUT lost Hunter.
And just cut it with trying to make me look like a "complainer" or anyone else who is not going to sit back and watch this train wreck. This is everyone's fed, not just Hunter's and we should have the right to express our concerns, regardless if the truth hurts too much for some people.
|
|
Jake
Members
Too fabulous for a title.....
Guido's reaction to Taylor's ban...JAGERBOMBS ALL AROUND!
Posts: 3,683
|
Post by Jake on Dec 1, 2007 19:23:25 GMT -5
Weird that I saw this coming from a mile away huh?
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Dec 1, 2007 19:24:14 GMT -5
A train wreck is where you're headed, my friend. ACW has operated like this for years, and we've survived fine and well. I go against the championship committee and most of your other stupid ideas BECAUSE this is everyone's fed.
This all comes to the simple "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" situation. Basically every single person who's wanted a title shot has gotten one before...but you. You're in line. And that's that. There's nothing else for you to accomplish, really. It's all fine, it's all working, and pretty much everyone's happy.
I'm not trying to make this my fed. I'm trying to KEEP the fed as it used to be. I'm a traditionalist, and I believe ACW should be exactly like it was before, because it all worked fine and dandy back in the day. You're not helping it in any way, no matter how much you may think that. You are a complainer, because the only problems you've found seem to be problems that only you have. Unless someone else cares to support an idea of yours?
Either way, hurry up and reply to this. Something tells me this topic will be locked soon. v_v
|
|
|
Post by scrawn on Dec 1, 2007 19:34:54 GMT -5
The Booking Committee was bad enough (IMO), hell even the Mod Committee was bad enough >_> but there is in no way in hell we need Championship Committee. What we need is to have the Booking Committee have more guidelines to titles. I am someone who believes people who are using the title in a storyline could be excempt from TV matches for a maximum of a month, say. But I also think title holders ought to tell the Booking Committee or be asked what their plans for the month are, so the Booking Committee know how to book that person for the month. Maybe there should be a third active member of the Booking Committee. I say that because I hear that only BK and Hunter do the work anyways, and since I'm pretty much inactive I nominate myself to take up this role.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Dec 1, 2007 19:36:39 GMT -5
Maybe there should be a third active member of the Booking Committee. I say that because I hear that only BK and Hunter do the work anyways, and since I'm pretty much inactive I nominate myself to take up this role. No, Dan. No.
|
|
|
Post by Thunderkiss on Dec 1, 2007 19:36:56 GMT -5
A train wreck is where I'm heading! Woo man, I just don't know how to take that. I think I need to sit down for a minute. Hold on.
*sits down*
Alright, my nerves feel a bit better now that I got rid of all that fear that built up in me as I read that. I'm able to type now
Again, I find it almost laughable that your continue to ignore pretty much what everyone else in this thread had to say. I guess it just comes down to character, of course. You do a pretty good job telling me what I am or what I'm not, so now its my turn:
You are NOT ACW's official spokesman. Making comments such as "I go against the championship committee and most of your other stupid ideas BECAUSE this is everyone's fed." show you deem yourself as such.
You are NOT head of the awards committee, so quit making threads or doing things as if you were. Senator made it perfectly clear what his intentions were, but yet here comes Hunter coming in and playing boss.
You are a weak champ who will not defend against anyone you deem as a threat. You have said you will not defend against Zero and you have also told me you would not defend against me because you thought I would beat you.
Yes Hunter, you are being a class act of ACW alright.
Now forgive me, is this the part that you fling another insult toward me? Just like you did twice today after it was apparent you dont know how to read.
|
|