|
Post by Dalton on Feb 15, 2011 22:51:51 GMT -5
....Really?
No, wait, let me rephrase that...
...REALLY?!
Seriously guys, get over yourselves. I thought we could put all this petty bullshit behind us with the closure of ACW.
|
|
|
Post by Thunderkiss on Feb 15, 2011 23:52:18 GMT -5
....Really? No, wait, let me rephrase that... ...REALLY?! Seriously guys, get over yourselves. I thought we could put all this petty bullshit behind us with the closure of ACW. Anyway, we are about at that point where someone will come in and do the "holier than thou" post explaining how we should be above all this even though the conversation had nothing to do with them, nor the insults. Or the point where Mark basically does the same thing only with a picture. Man, I was off by about a page.
|
|
|
Post by The Mainerishi on Feb 16, 2011 2:23:59 GMT -5
....Really? No, wait, let me rephrase that... ...REALLY?! Seriously guys, get over yourselves. I thought we could put all this petty bullshit behind us with the closure of ACW. You are a hypocrite to the extreme. You're telling those two to get over themselves, and you're the one who has "LEGEND" written in big letters in your sig like you were the biggest thing to come play this game. Sure, you were around a long time ago but then "The Genius" Lanny Poffo was around in the WWE a long time ago. He's not a legend. Why? Because he didn't accomplish anywhere near enough to get that kind of status.
|
|
|
Post by Reprobate on Feb 16, 2011 4:46:12 GMT -5
What is the Thunderkiss/Vortex argument even about at this point? Neither can realistically poke fun at the other for shortcomings in writing because they both have one major incident to their name (SLA with Thunderkiss and the Entertainment title shit with Vortex.) Everyone in this thread is a hypocrite, that's life. Changing your opinion after a while doesn't make you a hypocrite, it makes you a human being who actually grows over time.
The holier than thou posts that Thunderkiss was talking about always annoy me to no end, and this isn't one of them. I just want to know what the argument is about, because while I've been following it I still don't get it.
|
|
|
Post by El Shadowo on Feb 16, 2011 6:05:56 GMT -5
*Munches popcorn*
|
|
VorteX
Experienced Member
Stay a while...and listen.
Posts: 723
|
Post by VorteX on Feb 16, 2011 9:54:27 GMT -5
Rep, my 'major incident' had nothing to do with the ET, it was quite a long time before you 'graced' us with your presence.
In fact, there needed to be no argument here as I simply stated a fact to which TK decided to melodrama up and I just continued. Then you jumped in with some random reply--which I'm still not sure why you are here either, the place is closed--and some other crap happened and now here we are.
|
|
|
Post by The Mainerishi on Feb 16, 2011 10:20:40 GMT -5
What is the Thunderkiss/Vortex argument even about at this point? Neither can realistically poke fun at the other for shortcomings in writing because they both have one major incident to their name (SLA with Thunderkiss and the Entertainment title shit with Vortex.) Everyone in this thread is a hypocrite, that's life. Changing your opinion after a while doesn't make you a hypocrite, it makes you a human being who actually grows over time. The holier than thou posts that Thunderkiss was talking about always annoy me to no end, and this isn't one of them. I just want to know what the argument is about, because while I've been following it I still don't get it. I wouldn't say SLA was a major incident. The cause for SLA's creation was a major incident but I wouldn't say TK getting pissed off for this underhanded rendevous was exactly his fault. However I would argue that VorteX rage-quitting WAS his fault. Because of the secrecy of the calcs and blaming his frequent losses on mod bias. The formula to ACW as far as official appearances goes is this. "Write often and write well and you will win". Neither of which VorteX qualified for. I'd say TK leaving Entourage without telling anyone would be more of a major incident than that.
|
|
VorteX
Experienced Member
Stay a while...and listen.
Posts: 723
|
Post by VorteX on Feb 16, 2011 10:45:50 GMT -5
Thanks, Captain Obvious. As I mentioned previously, I realize now my frequency of writing was not enough to overcome the 'upper mid-card' bracket we had then. That, and I felt my win to Hunter--which should have been a big deal in-character--was negated by my string of losses. I got over it.
As for writing well...again that's subjective. I could say I write better than you and who would really win that argument? That's right...no one.
Finally, SLA became a major incident when it started appearing in all of ACWs shows for no reason other than a pissed off guy with a slight ego problem.
|
|
|
Post by The Mainerishi on Feb 16, 2011 12:28:15 GMT -5
Yeah because ACW has a notorious habit of not being able to let things go and to just live and let live. This argument is a prime example.
I remember after I jumped ship to SLA there was quite a few occasions when BK London took shots at me in his promo's for no apparent reason (in character, though OOC he had plenty of reasons to be pissed off with me). I'm pretty sure it wasn't just him who did it either. I think Freeman did it once or twice.
I mean, if you want an example that isn't me. Christ, who remembers Franchi$e? I wasn't even here during his "reign of terror" and I'm still well acquainted with his reputation.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Williams on Feb 16, 2011 14:28:58 GMT -5
--which I'm still not sure why you are here either, the place is closed-- Wouldn't this statement apply to EVERYONE that was lurking and posting here, including yourself, and surely not just Rep? Calling someone out for lurking and posting on a dead fed when that is exactly what you are doing at the very moment of calling that person out... it just seems kinda hypocritical to me. I'm not trying to make enemies here, and honestly I don't really know who you are to make enemies with, Vortex, but I'm just sayin...
|
|
|
Post by Chris Williams on Feb 16, 2011 16:46:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Reprobate on Feb 16, 2011 16:52:06 GMT -5
Rep, my 'major incident' had nothing to do with the ET, it was quite a long time before you 'graced' us with your presence. Your ordeal with the Entertainment title around OE was pretty bad, as TK said. And when I said SLA, I meant the entire debacle.
|
|
VorteX
Experienced Member
Stay a while...and listen.
Posts: 723
|
Post by VorteX on Feb 16, 2011 17:49:13 GMT -5
If you mean putting our feud (which was moving slower than a snail TBQH) aside so I could have a chance at winning a belt, then that's not what TK was getting at. TK was calling my reign bad, and again I'll attribute that to the fact that there was little competition. I did what I could, end of story.
Chris, I was speaking to Rep specifically. It's just that he has to have a reason to be here...case in point the final show. Since there are no shows anymore I was wondering why he would stick around considering the past history with this place. I don't mind (as what I said was merely a question not an attack), and besides there is no fed activity to hinder so who really cares.
|
|
|
Post by Thunderkiss on Feb 16, 2011 19:07:36 GMT -5
I like how this guy just keeps going, flinging the insults when its apparent I am trying to move on and ignore him. It's like he can't let it go. Considering some of the guys I've argued with, it's mind boggling to me that it would be some no name that would make it his life's vendetta to talk crap about me long after ACW has closed down. Be that as it may, you may be entitled to your opinion but you are making several points (that I tried to ignore) that are completely ignorant. As for writing well...again that's subjective. I could say I write better than you and who would really win that argument? That's right...no one. The whole point of e-fedding is to answer that exact question. There is a better writer and he or she is the one who wins the contest. In your mind you have constituted that you were a terrific writer. The end result shows a much different tale. Finally, SLA became a major incident when it started appearing in all of ACWs shows for no reason other than a pissed off guy with a slight ego problem SLA started appearing in all of ACW's shows?! SLA nor myself was not acknowledged by ACW as far as I know of. I believe that Rep mentioned me in a few promos afterward but that was about it. You are acting as if there was some sort of civil war after Omega Effect 5 and that could not be farther than the truth. You on the other hand created huge waves with the SLA deal, not only was there a formal letter of pissed off, there were the promos and general hostility. That had to cause quite a few people to stop reading the shows, as it was just so over the top. A formal letter of pissed off? I made one post to clarify my departure from ACW. Yes it was pissed off, I won't apologize for that. However, you act as if I put this on these very boards which I did not. I guess I should have just let everyone in the dark on why I left after Omega Effect Five because doing so makes me "melodramatic." No, me leaving and starting a fed should have occurred without any prior knowledge. Sounds like a great plan to me. In regards to your comment that people stopped reading the show, I remember there was a short lived spike after Omega Effect in both promos and page views. Also, "promos and general hostility?" Upon departure of ACW I rarely mentioned it on the few SLA shows there were. Vice-versa, I rarely saw my name mentioned here with the exception of a few Rep promos. Since everyone here was seemingly walking on eggshells and letting the destructive behavior go on, I decided to throw in my voice. Everyone was walking on eggshells? Letting destructive behavior go on? My God, in your mind this is how it all went down, isn't it? You are completely delusional. I wasn't even in ACW or posting on its boards so how could anyone stifle any such "horrible" behavior? You do have one thing right, however. This is when you decided to throw in your voice and you haven't stopped yapping (stalking) yet. It's too bad your hatred for me is what you'll always be known for, instead of a good title reign, a good story, etc. I honestly am not two faced. You just keep telling yourself that when four people in this thread have already said otherwise, joining the many more who have called you out on it over the years.
|
|
|
Post by Kim Jong CP on Feb 16, 2011 19:16:05 GMT -5
No, Kenny, he's talking about our SLA angle that you ran early this past year to help build our match at Ragnarok with the entire Join the Stable or Join the Movement stipulation.
|
|