|
|
Post by scrawn on Oct 1, 2004 16:50:22 GMT -5
Almost half the people aren't active, with most of them not playing a match. You should cut them, or at least give them a message, in which if they don't reply do in 2 weeks delete their accounts. With that many accounts with a lot being unused, it's no surprise mods are expecting requests and such.
|
|
|
|
Post by Latino on Oct 1, 2004 17:08:57 GMT -5
Ok I looked over the roster and it seems that we do have members who don't post. It is really scattered in the openers, lower midcard, and midcard section. Don't worry every now and then Ginger looks over the roster and decides who should be cut, pushed, demoted, etc. So all I am saying is don't worry since we will handle this. Also you have to remember that we may not be getting as much traffic as we did during the summer due to school and people just being more busy.
|
|
|
|
Post by ridley on Oct 1, 2004 17:16:40 GMT -5
That's what I'm here for.  |
|
|
|
Post by Yoko Satoshi on Oct 1, 2004 17:21:10 GMT -5
Also, some people just don't post often. I don't even have 100 posts yet, I think, and I'm still active.
But then again, I KNOW some of those people aren't active at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scientist GooeyGarth on Oct 1, 2004 17:26:16 GMT -5
*sits in the corner nodding*
mhm...hey wait a second...
|
|
|
|
Post by Chairman Gingerdude on Oct 2, 2004 3:59:41 GMT -5
They cut every month when I do the pushes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davey Marvel on Dec 18, 2004 1:16:17 GMT -5
whatever you do just do not stoop to a roster split. |
|
|
|
Post by scrawn on Dec 18, 2004 6:26:37 GMT -5
Actually, I'd like to see how well we'd do a roster split. But in the long run, I'd prefer not to have it
|
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Dec 18, 2004 6:33:32 GMT -5
Same here. Though I think a roster split would be pretty cool if we had more people. But then again, I like it the way it is now...
|
|
|
|
Post by Chairman Gingerdude on Dec 18, 2004 7:03:48 GMT -5
You need 60 members for a roster split if its going to work properly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Trainer kross on Dec 20, 2004 13:32:44 GMT -5
I wouldn't want to be bound to one show. Roster Splits make me sad.
|
|
|
|
Post by Latino on Dec 20, 2004 13:36:48 GMT -5
I actually don't think we need a roster split. In the past I was sort of for it but now I don't think it's a great idea. Plus with fallout being reworked for midcarders and below it should help people advance their own storylines possibly or just get some matches in.
|
|
|
|
Post by skurai on Dec 20, 2004 14:37:18 GMT -5
I have a feeling if we did do a roster split it would come back and bite us in the ass.
|
|
|
|
Post by Latino on Dec 20, 2004 14:44:49 GMT -5
So do I. I have a feeling it would just end up with us rejoining the brands.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wyvern on Dec 20, 2004 16:39:08 GMT -5
If the WWE was any indicator of how a roster split is, it sucks. It'll divide the roster more than just for matches, and I believe the collective quality of the cards may suffer.
|
|
