Some way to stop the arguments

[The Red Panther]

My idea is that whenever a topic is lockedd like the rant one, those involved in locking it (by arguing) are given a public warning. If given a second warning, they would have posting rights on OOC boards removed for a certain amount of time. These warnings may be contested publicly on the boards in an open debate and may be overturned. Just an idea, obviesly not 100% ready, just something needs to be done.

[rep]

Or make conflict resolution a board for regular users, if new people seeing the fighting is the issue.

You should be one to talk though... you told me to "shut the fuck up" for absoluely no reason.

[TJ]

*Locks topic*

Oh yea....

[The Red Panther]

Because whatever KIA was saying, you stated was wrong, even opinions. If you won't listen to logic, swearing may work.

[rep]

But there is an issue here with the set up. I said this to Cody when the topic was initally locked. How can you have a conflict resolution board where you don't allow the conflicts to resolve? Let us go until we're done and then it's been resolved. I don't know about anybody else, but of all of the arguments I've gotten in to here, I hold no grudge against a person for them. Time has healed them. Either let time heal the new ones or get rid of the conflict resolution board, it's only encouraging and giving us an excuse to argue.

[rep]

Aug 11, 2009 14:30:06 GMT -5 The Red Panther said:

Because whatever KIA was saying, you stated was wrong, even opinions. If you won't listen to logic, swearing may work.

But you aren't understanding... he wasn't using logic. If he was using logic he would agree with me.

You seem to have a problem with seeing how a mind works. I'm not going to "respect" someone else who says something the direct opposite of what I believe. I'm going to speak out against it. If you have a problem with me logically thinking and coming to a conclusion that I BELIEVE in, I'm not the one with the problem. Why should I have to see it from someone else's perspective? I'm never going to BE in their perspective, I'm in my own. Therefore what I believe is FACT... to ME.

[Dan White]

I agree with Red Panther, actually. I think in light of all the arguments that have resulted in locked topics lately, sorting something out to stop them would be ideal.

To be fair, Rep, there hasn't been a single topic on the conflict/resolution board that you've got involved in that got resolved.

[rep]

They ALL have, as I just said.

We're not arguing about NFL vs WWE anymore, are we?

[Dan White]

Rep, what you put in your sig is really harsh. I think you should remove it.

[The Red Panther]

Fair enough there, other then my posts there was no flaming, locking conflict resolution topics isn't helping. Like the social board topics thsy get locked.

[rep]

Aug 11, 2009 14:40:43 GMT -5 Dan White said:

Rep, what you put in your sig is really harsh. I think you should remove it.

No.

[Rena]

how is it harsh?

[rep]

If anything it's harsh towards Cody. CP spoke the words and they deserve to be heard.

[Dan White]

of course you can control it. You can control how gay you act. I know people who are gay but you wouldn't know it unless you asked them, because they'd rather not act in the gay stereotype. But you can't control ADD, because otherwise such a condition wouldn't exist.

Anyways, whatever, I'm ending this argument. Don't both replying because you won't get a response.

[Rena]

Aug 11, 2009 14:48:30 GMT -5 Dan White said:

of course you can control it. You can control how gay you act.

wow.

I guess you and I know from experience that you can control it.