|
Post by starkweather on May 20, 2007 10:49:58 GMT -5
*Already covered that on AIM, it's completely true and that's exactly what happened.*
|
|
|
Post by scrawn on May 20, 2007 13:50:33 GMT -5
Great show all.
Onto Omega Effect III!
|
|
|
Post by hunter on May 20, 2007 15:39:26 GMT -5
*prepares himself for another complex storyline explaining the disappearance of Hunter that practically is so far-fetched that no one here will even question it because that just how Hunter rolls and if it were done through any other person, we'd have such a situation on our hands that Hunter would probably bitch and moan and whatever about it not being his idea and that no one is even allowed to do something like that* ...what? o.O
|
|
|
Post by Shawn on May 20, 2007 16:18:10 GMT -5
Good show. Even though the recent trend towards insane over-the-topness is just a bit unsettling. You know with multiple murders, a rape scene, and Hunter coming back from the dead.
And for the record, he didn't have it perfectly planned from day one. His original idea would have made people cry even more. It was rather Spawnish. :-p
|
|
|
Post by Yoko Satoshi on May 20, 2007 16:25:26 GMT -5
Rattlesnake wins.
|
|
|
Post by starkweather on May 20, 2007 16:32:29 GMT -5
Good show. Even though the recent trend towards insane over-the-topness is just a bit unsettling. You know with multiple murders, a rape scene, and Hunter coming back from the dead. And for the record, he didn't have it perfectly planned from day one. His original idea would have made people cry even more. It was rather Spawnish. :-p Shawn spit da troof!
|
|
|
Post by xs3 on May 20, 2007 16:42:51 GMT -5
Andrew Hunter = Al Simmons?
|
|
|
Post by hunter on May 20, 2007 16:59:17 GMT -5
I did have it planned from day one. I then briefly considered the idea you speak of, so I went to you and asked you (privately) if you felt I should do it. But, yeah, thanks for that, mod.
|
|
|
Post by starkweather on May 20, 2007 17:01:19 GMT -5
Aw, someone's unhappy because his twist wasn't well-received...
|
|
|
Post by hunter on May 20, 2007 17:05:21 GMT -5
False. I'm unhappy because people attack it due to of "lack of realism." I've explained it again and again and again: I'm writing stuff that belongs in movies, and in a movie you wouldn't worry about realism. That, and it is realistic. You (collective, not specifically you, Stark) are attacking it before even knowing the rest.
Speaking of which, Stark, you don't even read my segments at all, as I mentioned yesterday. You STILL aren't in much of a position to say anything.
|
|
|
Post by starkweather on May 20, 2007 17:07:39 GMT -5
I know such a huge lack of realism has no place in feds, and have outlined this to you a dozen times.
|
|
|
Post by Shawn on May 20, 2007 17:09:17 GMT -5
I was merely jerking your chain, Hunter...and I didn't put out the specifics. Don't get upset.
For the record, I enjoyed what you wrote for the show. In fact, people in chat can testify that afterwards I say that, while I didn't agree with the twist, that I thought it was pretty well written.
You're improving as a writer, and one thing you need to come to terms with is that people won't always agree with what you write. What you wrote was good, and I think you should be happy with it if you like it...but I'm just not a fan of the twist. That's all.
Good job. I'm interested to see what you'll do with it.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on May 20, 2007 17:09:46 GMT -5
Live. With. It.
Seriously, if you don't even bother reading my stuff, then why do you care so much?
EDIT: The above is to Stark.
|
|
|
Post by starkweather on May 20, 2007 17:11:19 GMT -5
Why exactly do you care about my opinion anyway? After every twist you make you keep on comin' right back to me, asking how I liked it. As if some guy who barely even reads your work has something constructive to say.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on May 20, 2007 17:16:01 GMT -5
We've been through this, and will continue to go through it...on AIM. Discussion/argument over.
|
|