|
Post by hunter on Apr 27, 2008 9:46:34 GMT -5
Modified, and you know the rest of it...
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Jun 1, 2008 15:54:21 GMT -5
This one has been modified as well, because I REALLY didn't forget about it. >_>
|
|
|
Post by shikari on Jun 7, 2008 7:34:16 GMT -5
Won't BK be top after OE?
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Jun 7, 2008 7:50:38 GMT -5
That's if he doesn't leave in the "Loser Leaves ACW" match.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Jul 2, 2008 13:55:51 GMT -5
Modified. Although Evans and Lambert are listed as having their individual first PPV matches at OE4, which doesn't sound right to me. Well, Lambert, at least.
|
|
Jake Steele
Competition Judge
Nosepass, Pass Pass Pass
Posts: 3,230
|
Post by Jake Steele on Jul 2, 2008 14:20:10 GMT -5
Modified. Although Evans and Lambert are listed as having their individual first PPV matches at OE4, which doesn't sound right to me. Well, Lambert, at least. I'm not sure about Evans, but wasn't Lambert at the last OE?
|
|
|
Post by rosslambert on Jul 2, 2008 14:23:27 GMT -5
Modified. Although Evans and Lambert are listed as having their individual first PPV matches at OE4, which doesn't sound right to me. Well, Lambert, at least. I'm not sure about Evans, but wasn't Lambert at the last OE? This, he retired Renix Williams in a Home-Run Match, the baseball equivalent of a Texas Bullrope.
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Jul 2, 2008 15:34:45 GMT -5
Did you include both mine and Rattlesnake's two matches at OE?
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Jul 2, 2008 23:09:28 GMT -5
Yeah, I think I excluded Lambert at one point because I didn't want to count people who only had one match. I'll change that now.
And Dan, it doesn't count how MANY matches you had, just the fact that you wrestled there.
|
|
|
Post by acevans on Jul 2, 2008 23:16:50 GMT -5
Yeah, my first match on a PPV was at OE. I was around for Spring Into Hell, but I didn't have a match on the card.
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Jul 3, 2008 8:08:16 GMT -5
Well you put BK and Hunter at joint 1st, and then Jake 2nd. Shouldn't Jake be 3rd in that case?
|
|
|
Post by Commissioner Zero on Jul 3, 2008 9:24:15 GMT -5
No, because then 2nd would just be void like nobody's there which isn't true. Since Jake has the next amount, he gets the two spot and once he passes Hunter, and assuming BK keeps attending ppv's, then BK will remain 1, Jake will remain 2, and Hunter pushes to 3, sending everyone down a rank. It'll keep just going on like that with Hunter being passed by more people.
If that's too confusing then fine, leave 2 open. <_<
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Jul 3, 2008 9:40:20 GMT -5
No but in common knowledge, if people are equal it goes:
=1: Person A =1: Person B 3: Person C =4: Person D =4: Person E 6: Person F
Jake doesn't have the second most because there are two people ahead of him.
|
|
|
Post by BK London on Jul 3, 2008 12:28:19 GMT -5
Dan's right.
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Jul 3, 2008 22:34:25 GMT -5
I know. But deal with my way because it's just easier for me.
|
|