|
Post by Michael Smart on Jan 10, 2010 13:50:51 GMT -5
It's not too wide for me, either.
|
|
Taylor
Senatorial Stable
Posts: 255
|
Post by Taylor on Jan 10, 2010 14:05:23 GMT -5
I have a 14" laptop and it fits perfectly.
|
|
|
Post by Kim Jong CP on Jan 10, 2010 14:20:42 GMT -5
I have a 14" laptop and it fits perfectly. You want to know what else fits perfectly on something that's 14"
|
|
Taylor
Senatorial Stable
Posts: 255
|
Post by Taylor on Jan 10, 2010 15:07:36 GMT -5
<_>
|
|
|
Post by Jack Jefferson on Jan 10, 2010 20:30:09 GMT -5
To BK: (first point is for a few of you actually) It doesn't matter what size screen you have, what does matter is resolution. As it says at the bottom it's designed for the resolution 1280x1024 (I have a 19" monitor) which is what I use. So far I've viewed it on 3 different computers (the other two had monitors significantly smaller than mine) and it fits fine, but if people really have such an issue with it then I'll see if I can make changes. For the record, the reason it's so wide is the fact there are a lot of items in the navigation and I didn't want the text to be too small. The reason I put the title tags is because the images of the titles I've used are re-sized (due to the titles being different sizes) and therefore there was nowhere to save the full-sized title from to upload it themselves. If the rumours and gossip section was vertical rather than horizontal they would be housed in a tiny box in the bottom left corner. I made it horizontal to help frame the page. Once again, I'm not saying "I made it so fuck you if you disagree with my method". I'm just explaining why it is that way. For Freeman: Fuck you, the dates are staying "British". It is only America that uses the mm/dd/yyyy date format, the rest of the world is sensible and uses dd/mm/yyyy.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Jefferson on Jan 10, 2010 20:32:00 GMT -5
Damn, saved the wrong image >_<
|
|
VorteX
Experienced Member
Stay a while...and listen.
Posts: 723
|
Post by VorteX on Jan 10, 2010 23:15:42 GMT -5
The only thing I see glaring is our titles. I know it has been brought up before (and debated heavily), however I still like the ones Rep came up with. I know it would get rid of the legacy belts, however that's a reason for a history section. If I were new and came to look at what belt I would be going after and saw those, I would be turned off (and is thus why I used the band during my title reign instead of the actual title).
Anyway, that's not directly site related. As far as the on-topic discussion...you only really need to be above 1024x768 when designing...so I think we're fine there.
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Jan 11, 2010 10:45:06 GMT -5
I thought Rep's titles sucked. Just sayin'.
|
|
Taylor
Senatorial Stable
Posts: 255
|
Post by Taylor on Jan 11, 2010 10:55:06 GMT -5
They were just modified WWE ones >_>"
|
|
TJ
Experienced Member
I LOVE DAN WHITE
Good, you're working out Freeman....you're gonna need to
Posts: 848
|
Post by TJ on Jan 11, 2010 15:44:47 GMT -5
YEA! BLOCK THAT SLA MORON THUNDERKISS
|
|
|
Post by jonnyomega on Jan 11, 2010 16:32:23 GMT -5
It's not too wide for me, either. That's what she said!
|
|
Taylor
Senatorial Stable
Posts: 255
|
Post by Taylor on Jan 11, 2010 16:40:06 GMT -5
Hello there Daniel! Oh wait... I'm disappointed of you Jonny Hughes
|
|
|
Post by jonnyomega on Jan 11, 2010 16:55:48 GMT -5
That's what she said! ^
|
|
redbadger
New Breed
I don't look anything like this!
Posts: 56
|
Post by redbadger on Jan 11, 2010 17:34:50 GMT -5
Reading the first couple of posts starting at page two without reading the first page about what the topic is about raises some questions <__<
|
|
redbadger
New Breed
I don't look anything like this!
Posts: 56
|
Post by redbadger on Jan 11, 2010 17:39:01 GMT -5
Yay... I belong >__>!
|
|