|
|
Post by BK London on Nov 30, 2004 23:33:23 GMT -5
But Ragnarok is the Survivor Series Style PPV, we need the 4 on 4 teams.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wyvern on Dec 1, 2004 0:54:24 GMT -5
But Ragnarok is the Survivor Series Style PPV, we need the 4 on 4 teams. That would be kick ass... Survivor Series was the best in the ol' days of WWF (forget the World Wildlife Fund).  |
|
|
|
Post by Latino on Dec 1, 2004 5:42:49 GMT -5
Oh yea I forgot  . Well if you guys want it push it back to Bloody Valentine. |
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Dec 1, 2004 16:23:51 GMT -5
Cool, we have a Survivor Series style PPV? That's awesome. I so call being on someone's team...
|
|
|
|
Post by tntoholic on Dec 1, 2004 20:39:37 GMT -5
No, how bout we just have 5 on 5 or 4 on 4, but we just have it for the title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Latino on Dec 1, 2004 20:41:57 GMT -5
I don't think I'd like to defend my Title in that type of way.
|
|
|
|
Post by tntoholic on Dec 1, 2004 20:43:39 GMT -5
oh yeah, right right. Usually that type of match is for VACANT titles, but whatever, its cool. *bites an apple*
|
|
|
|
Post by Wyvern on Dec 1, 2004 22:06:17 GMT -5
How about we just have a tourney later? A Survivor Series-style set-up would be so awesome. To quote Hunter, "I so call being on someone's team", if it happens. Survey says: Tournament --->  Survivor Series-style matches ---> |
|
|
|
Post by willanger on Dec 2, 2004 4:20:01 GMT -5
Oh if the PPV is Survivor Series style, then I'd love to be on one of the teams...
|
|
|
|
Post by BK London on Dec 17, 2004 23:33:12 GMT -5
A thought? Tournament for Shot at International Title = Emperor of The Ring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Latino on Dec 18, 2004 0:45:01 GMT -5
True it could work that way as well. Then again if I remember right the EOTR winner gets a shot at whatever title he may be closest to in rank. Don't quote me on that though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davey Marvel on Dec 18, 2004 1:10:46 GMT -5
I agree that this should be survivor series styled, but I do prefer tournements better their are usually better storyline thst way. Usually their have been some good ones thought don't get me wrong.... |
|
|
|
Post by scrawn on Dec 18, 2004 6:29:54 GMT -5
We can't just have 4 vs. 4 or 5 vs. 5 for no reason. There's got to be a legit reason to have them, like through storylines. I call for a tag team title gauntlet match at this PPV
|
|
|
|
Post by hunter on Dec 19, 2004 7:12:36 GMT -5
I'm with DD. Wow, what a shock, I want to defend my titles. Weird, like the Outer Limits...Anyway, if we do have the match, someone will have to remind me of the rules of the match, and I vote that EVERY ACW Tag Team is involved!
|
|
|
|
Post by scrawn on Dec 19, 2004 8:50:28 GMT -5
Two teams starts in the ring, and when one team is defeated, another team comes down. It keeps going until there's no teams left
|
|
. Well if you guys want it push it back to Bloody Valentine.
