|
Post by worldbreaker on Dec 31, 2009 14:12:02 GMT -5
IF THIS ISN'T ACW, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS.
|
|
|
Post by Kim Jong CP on Dec 31, 2009 16:00:07 GMT -5
I don't mind the nomination bit Dave proposed, probably works for the best. I think the three with the most nominations should be it.
That work?
Oh and Kenny...touche.
|
|
|
Post by El Shadowo on Jan 3, 2010 14:26:50 GMT -5
You know, I started this idea up cause I wanted to show there's still some semblence of an OOC community here, and so we could celelbrate those who deserve to be celebrated.
As such, I'm a little ticked off that I have recieved ONE fucking reply of votes. ONE person has actually bothered to take the time to PM me their nominations. WTF people?
EDIT: Actually one person voted and one person told me they won't vote cause they've not been here long enough to have a good enough grasp on the fed. Where the hell is everyone else's votes <_<
|
|
Taylor
Senatorial Stable
Posts: 255
|
Post by Taylor on Jan 3, 2010 14:31:07 GMT -5
I was about to but then I realised I didn't read shows for pretty much the second half of the year so couldn't nominate fairly.
|
|
Jason Freeman
Competition Judge
Long Island Iced Free
Posts: 3,271
|
Post by Jason Freeman on Jan 3, 2010 14:32:27 GMT -5
Oh Ill do it now <_<
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Jan 3, 2010 14:44:03 GMT -5
Sorry Dave >_> I read that PM then read AK's "ACW future" PM and may have forgotten.
|
|
|
Post by The Red Panther on Jan 3, 2010 14:47:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Dan White on Jan 3, 2010 14:48:37 GMT -5
btw I suppose an excuse is that you didn't post your username in the PM message. People may have gotten confused <_<
|
|
|
Post by BK London on Jan 3, 2010 14:52:16 GMT -5
Honestly, like I said to CP, it probably wasn't a good idea to have people choose nominations since not everyone is going to want to read all the shows - the only reason it worked the first year for us was that we only had 6-7 months of ACW. You guys shouldve came up with a list of nominees and THEN sent it in - which wouldve been better than sending two mass PMs of people virtually voting twice for the same thing. I'm not knocking your idea (well, sorta), but even I anticipated a lack of response from the amount of work people had to do.
|
|
|
Post by The Red Panther on Jan 3, 2010 15:03:55 GMT -5
In my PM I said I didn't do all of them, but I ended up doing them all anyway <_<
|
|
Jason Freeman
Competition Judge
Long Island Iced Free
Posts: 3,271
|
Post by Jason Freeman on Jan 3, 2010 15:12:02 GMT -5
Its just kinda hard without a list of nominees. I read all the shows but dont really remember off the top of my head.
|
|
TJ
Experienced Member
I LOVE DAN WHITE
Good, you're working out Freeman....you're gonna need to
Posts: 848
|
Post by TJ on Jan 3, 2010 15:33:33 GMT -5
I was the first to send in votes and I only had from July to go off of
|
|
|
Post by El Shadowo on Jan 4, 2010 8:04:21 GMT -5
Honestly, like I said to CP, it probably wasn't a good idea to have people choose nominations since not everyone is going to want to read all the shows - the only reason it worked the first year for us was that we only had 6-7 months of ACW. You guys shouldve came up with a list of nominees and THEN sent it in - which wouldve been better than sending two mass PMs of people virtually voting twice for the same thing. I'm not knocking your idea (well, sorta), but even I anticipated a lack of response from the amount of work people had to do. Thats fair enough. I proposed the way we did it since I felt that was a bit more democratic than me saying "And the Wrestler of the year is Me, me or me". <_< Some categories, like champions of the year, are short enough, but other ones, like "Surprise Moment" or "Most Anticipated" I feel are better left to this process. That said, point taken. On the upside, I've got about 7 batches of nominations now, so am nearly good to go. I'll give it till tonight and then see who are the final nominations. I know I've talked to CP and I think Jack said he'd help, but if anyone else is willing to help with this show, I'd appreciate it.
|
|
Taylor
Senatorial Stable
Posts: 255
|
Post by Taylor on Jan 4, 2010 11:49:19 GMT -5
Sent
|
|
|
Post by El Shadowo on Jan 4, 2010 12:14:58 GMT -5
Thanks Taylor, and thanks to everyone who sent them in
|
|