|
Post by worldbreaker on Sept 3, 2009 22:24:45 GMT -5
Segments I read: Training by Michael Smart: I haven't read Smart's stuff yet and I've heard nothing but good things about him. This was a nice prematch promo to get his name out there before the big match and used the neat straight man/funny man routine. Victory by Rena and Jake Steele: It was nice seeing Steele again but I loved the bombshell of this promo with Jake Steele wanting kids. I have to be honest and say I don't see Jake as a character that wants to settle down. Yeah, TK did it, but TK is in his early 30's. Steele is a young wrestler in his 20's. If he wants kids now, he's going to give away his best years. Hidden Meanings In This Segment Will Make Sense To a Few People by Train: Andrew, screw that bee-yotch! One More Chance? by Dave Shadow and Jason Freeman: Freeman talks a lot. Concession stands make huge profits. Bad Ideas by Yoko and Sarin. Yuki's charm comes from her youthful spirit and that was properly displayed in this professionally written promo.
|
|
|
Post by jeff on Sept 3, 2009 22:25:55 GMT -5
Feedback: Jeff's 'Untitled' SegmentA good starter segment, although I would suggest finding a color choice for yourself and putting titles on your segments. I did like the compilation idea, although explaining those events through backstory segements is probably a good idea, otherwise they will be a collection of random events with little to no impact. I look forward to your future stuff. Well, thanks you for the kind words. Yes, multiple thanks, because I am too lazy to go back and fix a typo even though I'm not too lazy to go write all this explanatory stuff. Anyway... my last fed was a color-hating fed, you've probably seen a couple, and I did it that way because I was running late and didn't know the formatting. Rest assured my future work will be better looking than that one.
|
|
|
Post by Kim Jong CP on Sept 4, 2009 16:41:43 GMT -5
Selective Feedback
Rep--
Mr. Origininality does it again. For someone who hates one WWE E-feds for there lack of perceived originality I'm pleased we have in our midst his creative genius. We go from a total rip off of Raven, to a rip off of someone else's E-fed character. I'm not sure what's going to happen next as I don't see what else he can rip off.
Dave Shadow--
Dave showed tonight why he is considered the favorite to win EotR, his segments had good pacing as well as thought that didn’t come across as being inserted solely to get his MAX4. They all added something to the show as well as the allure of winning EotR.
Jonny Spade--
I don’t know if I buy a heel Jonny, considering the guy is just too nice out of character. That said however, I think this promo was really well done as far as getting his message across as well as breathing some life into the Jonny Spade character. I can see him challenging for the ET title soon enough.
VorteX--
I really like the one segment he did this week and I really do hope he gets a solid feud for the ET. Title. I think he has a good shot of going very far in the EotR division as well.
|
|
|
Post by rep on Sept 4, 2009 18:34:40 GMT -5
Jesus... someone is butthurt. Talk about originality... your character is basically the Eminem of wrestling. Maybe if you actually read promos instead of just faking it, you'd know exactly what my character was...
|
|
|
Post by Kim Jong CP on Sept 4, 2009 19:23:19 GMT -5
Jesus... someone is butthurt. Talk about originality... your character is basically the Eminem of wrestling. Maybe if you actually read promos instead of just faking it, you'd know exactly what my character was... Butthurt, naw. I was just leaving my honest feedback something which for the longest time you preached you were leaving. That was what everyone should be doing. Amazing however that you seem to take the offensive whenever someone says it about you. I mean, you can't be a hypocrite, the chances of that are less likely than me spontaneously combusting... excuse me while I STOP.DROP. AND ROLL! fuck, next time I'll come up with something less dangerous like me flying. *flies away*
|
|
|
Post by rep on Sept 4, 2009 20:27:20 GMT -5
That's not what you really believe though. I doubt you even read the promos. If I'm so unoriginal why were you regularly kissing my ass in the feedback from before? You're being very hippocritical.
|
|
Rena
New Member
Posts: 10
|
Post by Rena on Sept 4, 2009 21:45:59 GMT -5
Selective Feedback Rep-- Mr. Origininality does it again. For someone who hates one WWE E-feds for there lack of perceived originality I'm pleased we have in our midst his creative genius. We go from a total rip off of Raven, to a rip off of someone else's E-fed character. I'm not sure what's going to happen next as I don't see what else he can rip off. - Steele and I originally planned to do something during this period. When he was banned, Steele gave me complete control over his character so that we could live out whatever was planned. Rob has very kindly stepped in to be Steele at the moment in order to make segments seem as if they were written by two different people instead of a one-sided view of two characters written by me.
- Rob nor I have 'ripped' off of a character. We are using the exact same character, but we have humanized him. Instead of Steele seeming like this one-dimensional character, we are giving human qualities to Steele and reworked him. So, CP, this would be considered originality as we have taken a character given to us and reworked him.
- In the history of ACW, many people have left and allowed others to write for that character to use as they feel or to continue a storyline if the person has had to leave unexpectedly. I assume, though, that since you have not been around since ACW began you would not grasp this and I can see how your complete lack of education on this sort of situation would lead you to believe that Rob is 'ripping' off of someone.
- Perhaps in the future, as OUR segments (not just Rob's, but perhaps you can see my name beside his when reading) should be discussed on the content of the segment and not a side commentary on how Rob is 'ripping off' something.
|
|
|
Post by rep on Sept 4, 2009 23:24:47 GMT -5
...YEAH!
|
|