|
|
Post by rep on Aug 11, 2009 13:05:03 GMT -5
You're fabricating a formula to lead people to believe that you know what you're talking about. While it is true that the heel wins most of the feud, no where has there ever been a five match basis.
|
|
|
|
Post by rep on Aug 11, 2009 13:07:04 GMT -5
Are you retarded? No where did I make fun of someone with ADD... I was comparing an idiotic person who can't sit still with ONE feud for three months to a person who can't sit still or focus on one thing at a time. Idiots can control their idiocy and thoughts, people that suffer from ADD, ADHD, and the sort can't. That's the point he's making. You didn't make fun of someone with ADD, which is obvious, but comparing someone based on the fact they don't find 3 month feuds interesting because they get bored easliy isn't right. You could have said to people with short attention spans, but no you went full asshole. You never go full asshole you go half asshole (Cookie to who get the reference) If idiots could control their idiocy, you would be agreeing with me. Idiots can't control their idiocy, and people with ADD can't control their need to always start over with something new prematurely. You're missing the ENTIRE point. People who "get bored" in THREE MONTHS are ADD bookers. It IS right because it's a valid comparison. |
|
|
|
Post by rep on Aug 11, 2009 13:08:01 GMT -5
Maybe you're right... a person with ADD would probably actually be able to last three months. An idiot... now there's a person who would drop out on the third week.
|
|
TJ
Experienced Member
I LOVE DAN WHITE
Good, you're working out Freeman....you're gonna need to
Posts: 848
|
Post by TJ on Aug 11, 2009 13:18:32 GMT -5
You're fabricating a formula to lead people to believe that you know what you're talking about. While it is true that the heel wins most of the feud, no where has there ever been a five match basis. Going back to read the guide I found awhile ago that was posted over on another fed, the guide used 5 matches as an example, but it's still just one of many "formulas" for feuds. So now that we have that out of the way, answer my question that was, where is this mythical formula that all feuds follow so I can try to prove it wrong. Idiocy =/= "the need to always start over with something new prematurely" Perfect example, Idiocy is trying to prove something that was done that was more or less in the wrong, right. "the need to always start over with something new prematurely." is going back and rephrasing that statement. |
|
|
|
Post by El Shadowo on Aug 11, 2009 13:20:25 GMT -5
Tropic Thunder ftw <_<
|
|
TJ
Experienced Member
I LOVE DAN WHITE
Good, you're working out Freeman....you're gonna need to
Posts: 848
|
Post by TJ on Aug 11, 2009 13:25:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by rep on Aug 11, 2009 13:26:01 GMT -5
Even though I'm completely not wrong at all...
The formula of a feud is building up the heel side over the face side, letting the face get a few minor physical shots in but faces will mostly get their retribution in promos. Outside interference on the heel side will keep the face looking strong and make the heels look even worse. Heels should attack outside of matches and use interference during them. In the final match, usually with the title on the line, the face wins.
Am I saying anything that we all don't already know? This outline is used over the course of more than three months. You can't do all of that in one month. And if you try it, you've automatically failed.
You know... because how do you expect a story to be a story if it only lasts one month? It's mind blowing to hear a person say that three months is the maximum a feud should go. Have you people not SEEN any good wrestling? Are you all products of the "Attitude Era"? If so then I completely understand... you wouldn't know any better.
You people are watching too much of the current product if you really think this way.
|
|
|
|
Post by rep on Aug 11, 2009 13:27:01 GMT -5
As if that was an obscure reference... I'm pretty sure everyone who read that knew what you were alluding to. You and CP seem to have more than just bad planning in common. |
|
TJ
Experienced Member
I LOVE DAN WHITE
Good, you're working out Freeman....you're gonna need to
Posts: 848
|
Post by TJ on Aug 11, 2009 13:37:28 GMT -5
That's not the wrong I'm talking about, but I've tried to think of the possible feuds, or past feuds that have not used that formula, I came up with a few, but you being Rep would find something wrong with it.
But you see, if you were going full asshole all the time and you know, don't wait until 3 pages of flame war to post something other than, "You have ADD because you find 3 months too long." Or taking shots at people, people would find you a bit less annoying.
And yes me and CP have plenty in common, both play football, basketball, fed, are bookers, give out "bad" references and both believe you came from a test tube in a lab because something as annoying as you is not man made.
Rep - 3
TJ - 4. Oh yea!
|
|
Rena
New Member
Posts: 10
|
Post by Rena on Aug 11, 2009 13:54:26 GMT -5
Anyone who can't stick with a feud for a measily three months obviously has problems focusing or thinking. I appreciate the generalization that if you can't focus on a feud for three months you have ADD considering there are a whole host of a number of other things, including wanting to work with someone else, having to take a break before three months or a whole host of other issues that have come up. I didn't want to get into this, but I take severe offense to someone making fun of something like ADD, something that a person has no control over. This would be akin to me making fun of someone's race, if they have a large forehead, have an eating disorder or a whole list of other things. babe, do you have ADD? |
|
|
|
Post by Kim Jong CP on Aug 11, 2009 14:01:28 GMT -5
Are you retarded? No where did I make fun of someone with ADD... I was comparing an idiotic person who can't sit still with ONE feud for three months to a person who can't sit still or focus on one thing at a time.You're not making fun of them, just comparing them to idiots which obviously wouldn't be defaming to them. It's tactless, it's offensive and it's not right. Idiots can control their idiocy and thoughts, people that suffer from ADD, ADHD, and the sort can't. That's the point he's making. You didn't make fun of someone with ADD, which is obvious, but comparing someone based on the fact they don't find 3 month feuds interesting because they get bored easliy isn't right. You could have said to people with short attention spans, but no you went full asshole. You never go full asshole you go half asshole (Cookie to who get the reference) You're missing the ENTIRE point. People who "get bored" in THREE MONTHS are ADD bookers. It IS right because it's a valid comparison. It isn't right just because it's a "valid comparison." I'd assume if I made a sterotypical comparison involving Mexican's you'd get upset, I'm sure if I made a stereotypical comparison about women, AK would be upset and I know if I made a sterotypical comparison about an african american man BK would be upset. Just becuase the meaning is there does not mean it's right. I'm sure someone as all mighty as you could come up with a better metaphor than ADD becuase for those of us who have it, it's offensive comparing us to something. On top of that you are wrong, as hard as that is to conceive becuase this person with ADD has done a three month feud before and will do one again. |
|
|
|
Post by rep on Aug 11, 2009 14:03:53 GMT -5
I fucking knew you had ADD. So basically you're proving me right about people with ADD thinking three months is too long?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Red Panther on Aug 11, 2009 14:06:55 GMT -5
Shut the fuck up, you are not always right and until you realize that people will keep thinking of you as ignorant, Rep.
|
|
|
|
Post by BK London on Aug 11, 2009 14:08:38 GMT -5
Another topic ruined.
Thanks a lot.
This will now be locked until further notice.
|
|
